Meca has developed the MecaWind software, which can make all of these calculations much easier. Research is continuing on sloped canopies, and the Committee hopes to be able to include that research in the next edition of the Standard. Engineering Materials. Apr 2007 - Present 16 years. In ASCE 7-16, 'because of partial air-pressure equalization provided by air-permeable claddings, the C&C pressures services from Chapter 30 can overestimate the load on cladding elements. Code Search Software. The full-scale tests indicated that the turbulence observed in the wind tunnel studies from the 1970s, that many of the current roof pressure coefficients were based on, was too low. This calculator is for estimating purposes only & NOT for permit or construction. This separation was between thunderstorm and non-thunderstorm events. To resist these increased pressures, it is expected that roof designs will incorporate changes such as more fasteners, larger fasteners, closer spacing of fasteners, thicker sheathing, increased framing member size, more closely spaced roof framing, or a change in attachment method (e.g., change smooth shank nails to ring shank nails or screws). The significance of these changes is the increase in pressures that must be resisted by roof construction elements subject to component and cladding wind loads including but not limited to roof framing and connections, sheathing, and attachment of sheathing to framing. ASCE 7-16 has four wind speed maps, one for each Risk Category and they are also based on the Strength Design method. Table 1. Design wind-uplift loads for roof assemblies typically are determined using ASCE 7-16's Chapter 30-Wind Loads: Components and Cladding. Comparative C&C negative pressures for select locations, 15-foot mean roof height, Exposure B, Zone 2 or 2r (20- to 27-degree slope). Reference the updated calculations B pages 7 to 15. Terms and Conditions of Use It could be used to hide equipment on the roof and it can also serve as a barrier to provide some protection from a person easily falling off of the roof. Figure 5. The comparison is for 10 different cities in the US with the modifiers for Exposure B taken at 15 feet above grade, location elevation factor, smallest applicable EWA, and reduced wind speeds from new maps applied from ASCE 7-16 as appropriate. Structures, ASCE/SEI 7-16, focusing on the provisions that affect the planning, design, and construction of buildings for residential and commercial purposes. Don and Cherylyn explained the significant changes to the wind maps and provisions in ASCE 7-16 including the differences between ASCE 7-10 and 7-16 low-rise components and cladding roof pressures. ASCE 7-16 defines Components and Cladding (C&C) as: "Elements of the building envelope or elements of building appurtances and rooftop structures and equipment that do not qualify as part of the MWFRS (Main Wind Force Resisting System)." In simple terms, C&C would be considered as windows, doors, the siding on a house, roofing material, etc.. Further testing is currently underway for open structures, and these results will hopefully be included in future editions of the Standard. S0.01 - Please provide the wind pressure study and the components and cladding study in the permit submittal. Per ASCE 7-02 Code for Low-Rise, Enclosed Buildings with h <= 60' and Roof q <= 45. Reprinting or other use of these materials without express permission of NCSEA is prohibited. For Wind Direction Parallel To 28m Side Thus, we need to calculate the L/B and h/L: Roof mean height, h = 6.5 mBuilding length, L = 28 mBuilding width, B = 24 mL/B = 0.857h/B = 0.271 Wall Pressure Coefficients, \, and External Pressure, \ Enter information below to subscribe to our newsletters. Printed with permission from ASCE. Advanced Topics in the Seismic Design of Non-Building Structures & Non-Structural Components to ASCE 7-10 (AWI080213) Score: 70% Dec 2015 . Wind loads on every building or structure shall be determined in accordance with Chapters 26 to 30 of ASCE 7 or provisions of the alternate all-heights method in Section 1609.6. The new ASCE 7-16 Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures (Standard) is adopted into the 2018 International Building Code (IBC) and is now hitting your desks. As an example, a roof joist that spans 30 ft and are spaced 5 ft apart would have a length of 30 ft and the width would be the greater of 5 ft or 30 ft / 3 = 10 ft. Donald R. Scott is Senior Principal at PCS Structural Solutions, SEI President-elect, and chairs the SEI Codes and Standards Executive Committee. The two design methods used in ASCE-7 are mentioned intentionally. . The ASCE 7-16 classification types are Open buildings, Partially Open, Partially Enclosed, and Enclosed buildings. Wind Loads on Rooftop Solar Panels (ASCE 7-16 Sections 29.4.3 and 29.4.4) New provisions for determining wind loads on rooftop solar panels have been added to ASCE 7-16. Horizontal Seismic Design Force (Fp) is defined by the equation 13.3-1 in both ASCE 7-16 and 7-22, however, the formula in 7-22 is significantly different from that in 7-16. Calculate structural loadings for the International Building Code (2000 - 2021), ASCE 7 (1998 - 2016) & NFPA 5000 plus state codes based on these codes such as California, Florida, Ohio, etc. STRUCTURE USING Designer RCDC g per NSCP 2015/ASCE 7-10 C 360-10 by LRFD Method to STAAD ncrete Designer RCDC. One method applies specifically to a low-sloped roof (less than 7 degrees) (Figure 5) and the second method applies to any roof slope where solar panels are installed parallel to the roof. Skip to content. Case 2: 75% wind loads in two perpendicular directions with 15% eccentricity considered separately. Printedwith permission from ASCE. This limitation was removed in ASCE 7-16, and thus the provisions apply to rooftop equipment on buildings of all heights. Printed with permission from ASCE. About this chapter: Chapter 16 establishes minimum design requirements so that the structural components of buildings are proportioned to resist the loads that are likely to be encountered. Reprinting or other use of these materials without express permission of NCSEA is prohibited. It engages, enlightens, and empowers structural engineers through interesting, informative, and inspirational content. Thus starts the time when practicing engineers learn the new provisions of the Standard and how they apply to their practices. Zone 2 is at the roof area's perimeter and generally is wider than . ASCE 7 Hazard Tool. Apply wind provisions for components and cladding, solar collectors, and roof mounted equipment. Consequently, wind speeds generally decrease across the country, except along the hurricane coastline from Texas to North Carolina. Loading standard: The wind pressure value is calculated according to: ASCE/SEI 7-16 Chapter 30 Wind Loads - Components and Cladding (C&C), Part 1: Low-Rise Buildings. 26.8 TOPOGRAPHIC EFFECTS 26.8.1 Wind Speed-Up over Hills, Ridges, and Escarpments Wind speed-up effects at isolated hills, ridges, Don gave an excellent visual demonstration . ICC 500-2020 also requires that floor live loads for tornado shelters be assembly occupancy live loads (e.g., 100 psf in the case of ASCE 7-16) and floor live loads for hurricane . Wind Loads - Components and Cladding Calculator to ASCE 7-16 Easy to use online Wind Loads - Components and Cladding engineering software for American Standards. The calculations for Zone 1 are shown here, and all remaining zones are summarized in the adjacent tables. Related Papers. See ACSE 7-10 for important details not included here. The wind loads for solar panels do not have to be applied simultaneously with the component and cladding wind loads for the roof. The tool provides hazard data for all eight environmental hazards, including wind, tornado, seismic, ice, rain, flood, snow and tsunami. This preview shows page 1 - 16 out of 50 pages. Free Trial Wind Loads - Components and Cladding Features The ClearCalcs Wind Load Calculator to ASCE 7 makes it easy to perform in depth wind analysis to US codes in only minutes. MecaWind can do a lot of the busy work for you, and let you just focus on your inputs and outputs. We now follow the steps outlined in Table 30.3-1 to perform the C&C Calculations per Chapter 30 Part 1: Step 1:We already determined the risk category is III, Step 3: Determine Wind Load Parameters Kd = 0.85 (Per Table 26.6-1 for C&C) Kzt = 1 (There are no topographic features) Ke = 1 (Job site is at sea level) GCpi = +/-0.18 (Tabel 26.13-1 for enclosed building), Step 4: Determine Velocity pressure exposure coefficient zg = 900 ft [274.32] (Table 26.11-1 for Exposure C) Alpha = 9.5 (Table 26.11-1 for Exposure C) Kh = 2.01*(40 ft / 900 ft)^(2/9.5) = 1.044, Step 5: Determine velocity pressure qz = 0.00256*Kh*Kzt*Kd*Ke*V^2 = 0.00256*(1.044)*(1)*(0.85)*(1.0)*(150^2) = 51.1psf. Components and cladding for buildingswhich includes roof systemsare allowed to be designed using the Allowable Stress Design (ASD) method. For roof, the external pressure coefficients are calculated from Figure 27.3-1 of ASCE 7-16 where q h = 1271.011 Pa. For flat roofs, the corner zones changed to an 'L' shape with zone widths based on the mean roof height and an additional edge zone was added. It was found that the ASCE 7-05 wind loads for these clips are conservative, while several other studies have shown that the ASCE 7-05 is unconservative when compared to integrated wind tunnel pressure data. 0: 03-02-2023 by Steven Ray : ASCE 7-22,Table 12.2-1 SFRS confusion. Wind Design for Components and Cladding Using ASCE 7-16 (AWI050817) CEU:0.2 On-Demand Webinar | Online Individual (one engineer) Member $99.00 | Non-Member $159.00 Add to Cart Tag (s) Architectural, Structural, On-Demand, On-Demand Webinar Description View Important Policies and System Requirements for this course. ASCE 7-16 will introduce a fourth enhancement zone for roof attachment, in addition to the traditional industry standard perimeter, corner, and ridge zones used . ASCE 7-10 Gable Roof Coefficients 20- to 27-degree slope. . Design Example Problem 1a 3. Examples and companion online Excel spreadsheets can be used to accurately and efficiently calculate wind loads . Example of ASCE 7-16 Risk Category II Basic Wind Speed Map. determined using ASCE 7 16 s Chapter 30 Wind Loads Components and Cladding ASCE SEI 7 16 Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria June 16th, 2018 - ASCE SEI 7 16 Minimum Design Loads and Associated . Provides a composite drawing of the structure as the user adds sections. The designer may elect to use the loads derived from Chapter 30 or those derived by an alternate method.' Senior Code Compliance Engineer PGT Custom Windows + Doors f ASCE 7-16 Simplified Language for Effective Wind Area (Chapter 26 Commentary): Current language in ASCE 7-10: For typical door and window systems supported on three or more sides, the effective wind area is the area of the door or window under Examples would be roof deck and metal wall panels. This will give us the most conservative C&C wind pressure for each zone. Other permitted options based on ASCE 7-16 include the 2018 IBC and the 2018 Wood Frame Construction Manual (WFCM). This condition is expressed for each wall by the equation A o 0.8A g 26.2 . ASCE 7-16 states that the design of trucks and busses shall be per AASHTO LRFD Bridge Design Specifications without the fatigue dynamic load allowance provisions. Enclosure Classifications 2. Case 3: 75% wind loads in two perpendicular directions simultaneously. As you can see in this example, there are many steps involved and it is very easy to make a mistake. . Each of these provisions was developed from wind tunnel testing for enclosed structures. The wind speeds in the northern Great Plains region remain approximately the same as in ASCE 7-10. Research became available for the wind pressures on low-slope canopies during this last code cycle of the Standard. 2017 Florida Building Code . See ASCE 7-16 for important details not included here. Wind load design cases as defined in Figure 27-4-8 of ASCE 7-16 Case 1: Full wind loads in two perpendicular directions considered separately. Before linking, please review the STRUCTUREmag.org linking policy. In order to calculate the wind pressures for each zone, we need to know the effective area of the C&C. Examples of ASCE 7-16 roof wind pressure zones for flat, gable, and hip roofs. There is no audio, it is just a 2.5 minute video showing how you enter Part 1 and then switch to Part 4 for the results. One new clarification is that the basic design wind speed for the determination of the wind loads on this equipment needs to correspond to the Risk Category of the building or facility to which the equipment provides a necessary service. MWFRS is defined as " (a)n assemblage of structural elements to provide support and stability for the overall structure." 7-16) 26.1.2.2 Components and Cladding. Using all of this criteria, we can then determine that the only two methods of Chapter 30 where we meet all criteria are Part 1 and 4 (see chart). Printed with permission from ASCE. ASCE/SEI 7-16 (4 instead of 3), the net difference is difficult to compare. Example of ASCE 7-16 Sloped Roof Component & Cladding Zoning for 7 to 20 degree roof slopes. Click below to see what we've got in our regularly updated calculation library. When you ask for FORTIFIED, you're asking for a collection of construction upgrades that work together to protect your home from severe weather. Quality: What is it and How do we Achieve it? These tests established that the zoning for the roof on these low-slope roof structures was heavily dependent on the building height, h, and much less dependent on the plan dimensions of the building. These pressures follow the normal ASCE 7 convention, Positive pressures are acting TOWARD the surface, and Negative Pressures are acting AWAY from the surface. Allows the user to define roof slopes in terms of degrees or as a ratio (x:12) and to input all salient roof dimensions. Using Method 1: Simplified Procedure (Section 6.4) Civil Engineering Resources. Note 5 of Figut 30.3-1 indicates that for roof slopes <= 10 Deg that we reduce these values by 10%, and since our roof slope meets this criteria we multiply the figure values by 0.9, Zone 4: GCp = +1.0*0.9 = +0.9 / -1.1*0.9 = -0.99, Zone 5: GCp = +1.0*0.9 = +0.9 / -1.4*0.9 = -1.26. There is interest at the ASCE 7 Wind Load Task Committee in studying ways to make these changes simpler and reduce possible confusion in the application of C&C provisions for the ASCE 7-22 cycle. An updated study of the wind data from over 1,000 weather recording stations across the country was completed during this last cycle. Yes, I consent to receiving emails from this website. See ASCE 7-16 for important details not included here. Figure 4. Printed with permission from ASCE. The ASCE7-16 code utilizes the Strength Design Load also called (LRFD Load Resistance Design Load) method and the Allowable Stress Design Load (ASD) method. Figure 2. Engineering Express 308 subscribers Understand the concepts & inputs for the Engineering Express ASCE 7 16- ASCE 7-10 Wall Components & Cladding Design Pressure Calculator. This reduction was provided in the Commentary of previous editions of the Standard; however, it is being brought into the body of the Standard to facilitate its use. Hip roofs have several additional configurations that were not available in previous editions of ASCE 7. Example of ASCE 7-16 Risk Category IV Basic Wind Speed Map. Which is Best? The most significant reduction in wind speeds occurs in the Western states, which decreased approximately 15% from ASCE 7-10 (Figures 1 and 2). Before linking, please review the STRUCTUREmag.org linking policy. This value is then multiplied by the value obtained from Fig 30.4-1. The component and cladding pressure coefficients, ( GCp ), for roofs on buildings with an h < 60 feet, have been revised significantly in ASCE 7-16. Explain differences in building characteristics and how those differences influence the approach to wind design. Designers are encouraged to carefully study the impacts these changes have on their own designs or in their standard design practices. The process to calculate wind load in the provisions of the American Society of Civil Engineers Standard (ASCE 7-16, 2016), the National Building Code of Canada [42], the Australian/New Zealand . (Note: MecaWind makes this adjustment automatically, you just enter the Width and Length and it will check the 1/3 rule). It also has a dead and live load generator. The roof zoning for sloped roofs kept the same configurations as in previous editions of the Standard; however, many of the zone designations have been revised (Figure 7). ASCE 7-16 has four wind speed maps, one for each Risk Category and they are also based on the Strength Design method. Wind speed maps west of the hurricane-prone region have changed across the country. The ASCE 7 Hazard Tool provides a quick, reliable way to access the digital data defined in the hazard geodatabases required by ASCE/SEI 7-22. Chapter 30 of ASCE 7-16 provides the calculation methods for C&C, but which of the seven (7) parts in this section do we follow? STRUCTURE magazine is a registered trademark of the National Council of Structural Engineers Associations (NCSEA). 1: Join the discussion with civil engineers across the world. Also, a small revision was made to the hurricane wind speeds in the Northeast region of the country based upon updated hurricane models. Thus, the roof pressure coefficients have been modified to more accurately depict roof wind pressures. Wind Loading Analysis MWFRS and Components/Cladding. Contact [email protected] . This chapter presents the determination of wind pressures for a typical open storage building with a gable roof. 1609.1.1 Determination of Wind Loads. To be considered a low rise, the building must be enclosed (this is true), the h <= 60 ft [18] (this is true) and the h<= least horizontal width. The simplified procedure is for building with a simple diaphragm, roof slope less than 10 degrees, mean roof height less than 30 feet (9 meters), regular shape rigid building, no expansion joints, flat terrain and not subjected to special wind condition. The type of opening protection required, the ultimate design wind speed, Vult, and the exposure category for a site is permitted . These changes are illustrated in Figure 1. In this case the 1/3 rule would come into play and we would use 10ft for the width. Figure 6. Abstract. This is considered a Simplified method and is supposed to be easier to calculate by looking up values from tables. In first mode, wall and parapet loads are in The changes include revised wind speed maps, changes in external pressure coefficients for roof components and cladding and the addition of pressure coefficients to use for roof mounted solar arrays. Network and interact with the leading minds in your profession. ASCE 7-16 describes the means for determining design loads including dead, live, soil, flood, tsunami, snow, rain, atmospheric ice, earthquake, wind, and fire, as well as how to assess load combinations. The new Ke factor adjusts the velocity pressure to account for the reduced mass density of air as height above sea level increases (see Table). CADDtools.com presents the Beta release of the ASCE 7-16 wind load program to calculate the design pressures for your project. Two methods for specific types of panels have been added. Figures 2 and 3 illustrate the changes in the number of zones as well as the increases in the roof zone coefficients from ASCE 7-10 to 7-16 for gable roofs. You will receive an email shortly to select your topics of interest. ASCE 7-16 FORTIFIED Wind Uplift Design Pressure Calculator for Residential Roof Coverings (2:12 or Greater)1,2,3. ASCE Collaborate is updating to a new platform. - Main Wind Force Resisting Wystem (MWFRS) - Components & Cladding (C&C) The software has the capability to calculate loads per: - ASCE 7-22 - ASCE 7-16 - ASCE 7-10 (version dependent) - ASCE 7-05 (version dependent) - Florida Building . ASCE 7 ONLINE - Individual and Corporate Subscriptions Available A faster, easier way to work with the Standard ASCE 7 Online provides digital access to both ASCE/SEI 7-16 and 7-10 but with enhanced features, including: side-by-side display of the Provisions and Commentary; redlining. The coefficients for hip roofs are based on the h/B ratio (mean roof height to the building width ratio) and, for roofs with slopes from 27 to 45, the coefficients are a function of the slope. Thank you for your pateience as we make the transition. Login. These changes are: Table 2 illustrates the Zone 2 (20- to 27-degree slope) C&C pressures for ASCE 7-10 compared to the pressures developed in accordance with ASCE 7-16. These new maps better represent the regional variations in the extreme wind climate across the United States. Experience STRUCTURE magazine at its best! However, the roof still needs to be designed appropriately assuming the solar panels are removed or not present. An Introduction to ASCE 7-16 Wind Loads - Three Part Series-PART 1; An Introduction to ASCE 7-16 Wind Loads - Three Part Series-PART 2; An Introduction to ASCE 7-16 Wind Loads - Three Part Series-PART 3; An Introduction to HEC-RAS Culvert Hydraulics; An Introduction to Value Engineering (VE) for Value Based Design Decision-Making All materials contained in this website fall under U.S. copyright laws. As illustrated in Table 2, the design wind pressures can be reduced depending on location elevation, wind speed at the site location, exposure and height above grade, and roof shape. Wind speeds in the Midwest and west coast are 5-15 mph lower in ASCE 7-16 than in ASCE 7-10. Other permissible wind design options which do not reflect updated wind loads in accordance with ASCE 7-16 include ICC-600 and AISI S230. New additions to the Standard are provisions for determining wind loads on solar panels on buildings. Alternative Designs for Steel Ordinary Moment Frames, An Interactive Approach to Designing Calmer Streets for Residential Subdivisions, An Introduction to ASCE 7-16 Wind Loads - Three Part Series-PART 1, An Introduction to ASCE 7-16 Wind Loads - Three Part Series-PART 2, An Introduction to ASCE 7-16 Wind Loads - Three Part Series-PART 3, An Introduction to HEC-RAS Culvert Hydraulics, An Introduction to Value Engineering (VE) for Value Based Design Decision-Making, Analysis and Design of Veneer Cover Soils for Landfills and Related Waste Containment Systems, Application of Computational Fluid Dynamics to Improve Mixing and Disinfection for Ozone Contactors, Applying Access Management to Roadway Projects, Approaches to Mitigation of Karst Sinkholes, Architectural Concrete: Design and Construction Strategies to Maintain Appearance & Limit Water Intrusion, ASCE 59-11 Blast Protection of Buildings - Blast-Resistant Design of Systems, and Components, ASCE/SEI 41-17: Performance Objectives & Seismic Hazard Changes, ASCE/SEI 41-17: A Summary of Major Changes, ASCE/SEI 41-17: Analysis Procedure Changes, Assessment and Evaluation Methods and Tools of Structural Forensic Investigations, Avoid Costly Mistakes Using HEC-RAS - Understanding HEC-RAS Computations, Avoiding Ethical Pitfalls in Failure Investigations, Avoiding Problems in Masonry Construction, Avoiding Problems in Specifying Metal Roofing, Basics of Drainage Design for Parking Lot including LID Techniques, Beaver Dam Analogue Design: Using the Tool, Beneficial Uses and Reuses of Dredged Material, Benefits of Pavement Reclamation: How In-Place Recycling has Worked for National Parks/Forests, Best Practices and Lessons Learned from the Design and Construction of Rigid Pavements, Best Practices for Crack Treatments for Asphalt Pavements, Best Practices of Incorporating Reclaimed Asphalt Pavement and Rejuvenation Alternatives, Bridge Deep Foundation Design for Liquefaction and Lateral Spreading - Lessons Learned, Building Enclosure Commissioning (BECx): What You Need to Know, Building Renovation On-Demand Webinar Package. These provisions give guidance to the users of ASCE 7 that has been missing in the past. Most of the figures for C&C start at 10 sq ft [0.9 sq m] and so for the purpose of this example we will consider an effective area of 10 sq ft for all wall and roof wind zones. Design Example Problem 1b 4. Referring back to Table 30.6-2, it indicates in note 5 that when Fig 30.4-1 applies then we must use the adjustment factor Lambda for building height and exposure. Because the building is open and has a pitched roof, there . WIND LOADING ANALYSIS - MWFRS and Components/Cladding. Minimum Design Loads and Associated Criteria for Buildings and Other Structures. Instructional Materials Complementing FEMA 451, Design Examples Nonstructural Components 16 - 14 Load Combinations In ASCE 7-05, the redundancy factor, , is specified as 1.0 for nonstructural components. Cart (0) Store; Limitations: Building limitations are described in ASCE/SEI 7-16, Section 30.4 (Low-rise building with certain roof configurations and h 60 ft.) Fortunately, there is an easier way to make this conversion. Contact publisher for all permission requests. Note that for this wind direction, windward and leeward roof pressures (roof surfaces 1 and 2) are calculated using = 36.87 and = 0 for roof surfaces 3 and 4. If we calculate the Component and Cladding wind pressure for an exterior wall of a building located in USA Zip Code 32837, we find the . There is a definition of components and cladding in the commentary to ASCE 7-95. | Privacy Policy. Questions or comments regarding this website are encouraged: Contact the webmaster. STRUCTURE magazine is the premier resource for practicing structural engineers. Let us know what calculations are important to you. Figure 1. In conjunction with the new roof pressure coefficients, it was determined that the existing roof zoning used in ASCE 7-10 and previous editions of the Standard did not fit well with the roof pressure distributions that were found during these new tests for low-slope ( 7 degrees) roof structures. ASCE 7-16's zone diagram for buildings 60 feet and less has a Zone 1' in the center of the roof area's field and is surrounded by Zone 1. A Monoslope roof with a slope between 3 deg and 10 deg follows Fig 30.3-5A. Printed with permission from ASCE. Figure 3. Since our Roof Angle (4.76 Deg) <= 10 Deg, then we can take h as the eave height (EHt). Design Wind Pressures for Components and Cladding (C&C) . Pressure increases vary by zone and roof slope. We will first perform the calculations manually, and then show how the same calculations can be performed much easier using the. MWFRS and components and cladding Wind load cases Example - low-rise building - Analytical method ASCE 7 -16 Chapter 13 discusses requirements for support of non-structural components such as cable trays.<o:p></o:p><o:p> </o:p> ASCE 7-16, Chapter 13, Item 3.3.1.1 gives some equations for horizontal forces for seismic design for components that include an importance factor. Airfield Pavement Condition Assessment - Manual or Automated? Since we have GCp values that are postive and negative, and our GCpi value is also positive and negative, we take the combinations that produce the largest positive value and negative value for pressure: p1 = qh*(GCp GCpi) = 51.1 * (0.3 (-0.18)) = 24.53 psf (Zone 1), p2 = 51.1*(-1.1 (+0.18)) = -65.41 (Zone 1). 050-parapets-where-roofs-meet-walls Components and Cladding (C & C) Parapet Wind Load, ASCE 7-16 Figure 30.8-1 . 2022 American Society of Civil Engineers, Innovative seismic design shaped new airport terminal, Fast Forward: Visualization unveiled for unbuilt Frank Lloyd Wright tower, From the Field: Immersive identity shapes design of Meow Wolf Denver, Bidirectional energy hub successfully demonstrated in Tennessee, AEI International Student Design Competition 2023, 2022 GI Web Conference 2022: Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics Technical Committee - Seismic Hazard Evaluation for the Western, Central, and Eastern US, 2022 GI Web Conference: A Quick Look into Some of the Latest in Grouting Research, Design and Practice, 2022 GI Web Conference: Earthquake Engineering and Soil Dynamics Technical Committee - Soil-Structure Interaction, 2022 GI Web Conference: Embankments, Dams, and Slopes Case Histories, 2022 GI Web Conference: Embankments, Dams, and Slopes Technical Committee - Extreme Events on Geotechnical Infrastructure, 2022 GI Web Conference: Geoenvironmental Engineering Technical Committee - Subsidence Risk Mitigation in a Low-level Radioactive Waste (LLW) Landfill Final Cover: A Case History, 2022 GI Web Conference: Geology and Site Characterization Technical Committee - Bioinspired Geotechnics, 2022 GI Web Conference: Soil Improvement Committee - Case Histories in Soil Improvement for Civil Infrastructure, 2022 GI Web Conference: Sustainability in Geotechnical Engineering Technical Committee - Novel Approaches Toward Sustainable Geotechnical Engineering, 2022 GI Web Conference: Unsaturated Soils Technical Committee - Unsaturated Soils in a Changing Climate, A Data Base and Recommendation on 400 Failed MSE Walls with Geosynthetic Reinforcement, Access Management On-Demand Webinar Package, Alternative Designs for Anchorage to Concrete, An Introduction to Traffic Signal Operations, Bridge Scour, Part 2: Understanding HEC-18 and General Guidance on Scour Analysis, Case Studies in Sustainable and Resilient Structural Engineering, Mechanics, and Materials (SR-SEMM), Case Study: A Fresh Look at the Citicorp Engineering Ethics Dilemma, Certification Guidelines for Stormwater Manufactured Treatment Devices, Culvert Design for Fish Passage - Concepts and Fundaments, Culvert Design for Fish Passage - Concepts and Fundaments-1, Culvert Modeling Using HEC-RAS in 1-D: Part 1, Building the Model, Design Modern Roundabouts - How to Handle Drainage and Grading, Design of Thrust Restraint for Pressure Pipes, Designing Nonbuilding Structures Using ASCE/SEI 7-16, Evaluation of Building Structural Stability - A Qualitative Approach, Evolutionary Optimization for Hybrid System of Post-Tensioned Cross-Laminated Timber and Light-Frame Wood Shear Walls in Mid-Rise Buildings, Fiber-Reinforced Polymer Composites for Civil and Environmental Engineers, Flexible Pavement Evaluation for Effective Decision Making, Geothermal Energy: A Renewable and Sustainable Source to Heat and Cool the Building Envelope, Geothermal Energy: A Renewable and Sustainable Source to Heat and Cool the Buildings Envelope, How & Why to Use ASCE 7-22 in Your Practice, International Perspectives on Water Resources and the Environment - Part 1, International Perspectives on Water Resources and the Environment - Part 2, Introduction of Geotechnical Grouting, Rock Mechanics, and Unsaturated Soil Mechanics On-Demand Webinar Package, Kendeda Building Part 1 - The Living Building Challenge, Kendeda Building Part 2 - Reuse and Red List, Kendeda Building Part 3 - Water and Landscape Architecture, Navigation Engineering On-Demand Webinar Package, People-Centric AI for Resilient, Sustainable, Safe and Healthy Built Environments, Performance Based Seismic Design of Structural Buildings, Permeable Pavements On-Demand Webinar Package, PFAS Contamination Translating Research to Practice, Prepare to Engineer Tomorrow, Starting Today with Responsible Innovation, Principled-Based Ethics: Character-Builder or Career-Ender, Refined Analysis to Support Bridge Management, SEI Standards Series: ASCE 7-22 On-Demand Webinar Package, Seismic Screening, Risk and Assessment of Buildings On-Demand Webinar Package, Significant Changes 7-22 On-Demand Webinar Package, Significant Changes to the Wind Load Provisions of ASCE 7-22 Part 2, Significant Changes to the Wind Load Provisions of ASCE 7-22 Part 3, Soils and Soil Mechanics - Nuances of Borehole and Sample Logging, Sustainability Series Part 1: Carbon Reduction and Renewable Energy, Sustainability Studies and Assessments of Ground Modification Works for Civil Infrastructure, Sustainable Geotechnical Applications: Recycled Base Aggregates in Pavement Applications - Part III of VI-1, Sustainable Geotechnical Applications: Sustainability & Life Cycle Analysis of Recycled Materials - Part VI of VI-1, Sustainable Geotechnical Applications: Tire Derived Aggregate in Geotechnical and Environmental Applications- Part V of VI-1, Traffic Signals On-Demand Webinar Package, Tuned Mass Damper Applications to Reduce Wind Induced Vibrations of Tall and Slender Structures, Updating Structural Specifications to Reduce Embodied Carbon, 2015 Special Design Provisions for Wind and Seismic (SDPWS) - Overview, 21st Century Bridge Evaluation: New Technologies and Solutions, A Data Base and Recommendations on 320 Failed MSE Walls with Geosynthetic Reinformenet, A General Overview of ASCE 7-16 Changes to Wind Load Provisions, A Rational Approach to Structural and Seismic Issues Related to Historic Buildings, Advanced Bridge Hydraulics - Moving beyond 1D, Advanced Topics in the Seismic Design of Non-Building Structures & Non-Structural Components to ASCE 7-10, Advanced Topics in the Seismic Design of Nonbuilding Structures and Nonstructural Components to ASCE 7-16.